Drafts (1)

there was this article someone once wrote, concerning 'discentralization'. i started writing a reply via email, which was never finished. so for the last-oh,i dunno-couple of years, i've had this annoying draft in my email. so here it is,unfinished, finally, no drafts!! : ) it'll probably make no sense to you what so ever, but that's so not the point. ;p

i think (and this is also a question) that the main issue of your article is about depending on somebody other than yourself. And in addition, how that leads to a not so healthy world-,others-,self-view. ok. i liked your point on nature's discentralization. but how do you know for sure that that's the way it is? ;) trick question,my bad ;p all i'm trying to say here is that maybe it was set in the beginning of times to work the way it works, just like a clock, with super alkaline batteries that'll endure forever. (by the way, what about animals?? or aren't they considered part of nature? isn't it interesting, how differently different species work? and as far as i know, some of them are extremely centralized! is it their choice? the problem with us humans is that we always have the impression/illusion of free will --and i'm not diminishing it's concept or importance by saying this-- while we should start accepting some things as part of how humans are built. we need. and the less we realize that, the more we actually need. i need facebook. but do i reeeally need it? i need my computer. but do i reeeeeeally need it?? (quote: The Mighty Boosh!)not realizing what i truly need, makes me 'need' many, but not so essential stuff. i know this might seem irrelevant to the subject... my point is (i think) that we were driven towards centralization for some cause. and that is a result of us living in groups. if people were all loners, we would be fine on our own. we are in fact loners in a huge net. just like spiders. in the end, maybe it's all about networking.